Book Review: The Practicing Stoic

The Practicing Stoic: A Philosophical User’s Manual is a new book by Ward Farnsworth. Farnsworth is Dean of the University of Texas School of Law. He has previously written books on rhetoric, one specifically about the use of metaphor. This book struck me first and foremost as having been written with exceptional verbal clarity and precision. Perhaps that’s due in part to the author’s knowledge of rhetoric and his interest in the law.

I really enjoyed the book. It’s a valuable and well-written addition to the growing body of literature on Stoicism. In addition to being very nicely written, it’s also very well-organized and it includes many quotes from ancient Stoics and related thinkers that will probably be unfamiliar to most readers interested in Stoicism. So it definitely adds something – it’s not just another beginner’s guide to Stoicism.

The content consists of quotations from various relevant authors – from Epictetus and Cicero to Montaigne and Schopenhauer. Some of these were taken from existing translations and some are new. They’re organized thematically in chapters about the topics of judgement, externals, perspective, death, desire, wealth and pleasure, what others think, valuation, emotion, adversity, virtue, and learning. Farnsworth includes his own commentary, which I found insightful, original, and therefore quite valuable.

He concludes with a chapter called Stoicism and its critics which cites important criticisms of Stoicism made by other authors. These are addressed and, again, this is worth reading because it dispels several common misconceptions about Stoicism such as the idea that Stoics are cold-hearted, unemotional, or lacking compassion.

I particularly liked his point that the goal of Stoicism resembles the sort of emotional response we’d expect someone to have to distressing events if they could have lived much longer and experienced them enough times to become used to them. He explains the Stoic attitude to consoling grieving friends as follows…

Your attitude might resemble that of a doctor – a very good one let’s say – who has had a long career of working with dying patients and their families. In the best doctor of that sort we would find kindness, warmth, adn compassion. There would be feeling. But emotion [passion] would be unlikely. You would sympathize but you would not go through mourning of your own. You would have seen it all too many times for that.

In conclusion, I’d definitely encourage others interested in Stoicism to read this book. It’s probably one of the best books on the subject that I’ve read recently. As I mentioned above, it’s very well-written, using admirably precise language, and the selection and organization of quotes from the primary sources was very well done. Those of you who have read some books on Stoicism already will definitely find this a fresh take on things and I’d also think that newcomers to the subject would enjoy it and find it accessible.

NEW: Free Email Course on The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius

The MeditationsI’m delighted to announce that I’ve just launched a brand new email course on The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius.  It’s completely free of charge.  Everyone is welcome.  You can join at any time and you’ll start receiving the first email.

Enroll now to obtain a whole bundle of extra freebies.  You’ll receive weekly emails with passages from The Meditations, including my commentary on the text.  See the course website for more details or click the enroll button below:

You’ll also be granted free access to the following bundle:

  • The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius (George Long trans.) eBook
  • The Eulogium on Marcus Aurelius eBook
  • Marcus Aurelius in the Roman Histories eBook
  • Marcus Aurelius HD Wallpapers

I’m very excited about running this course because The Meditations is easily my favourite text on Stoicism.  I’ve been pretty immersed in the text recently, while working on my new book How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius.  It’s great to have the opportunity to study it even more closely, though, going through it passage by passage with a group of students.  I hope you enjoy reading the lessons as much as I enjoy writing them!


Donald Robertson Signature

Where They Laughed at Socrates

Theatre of DionysusToday I visited the Theatre of Dionysus, the place where Athenians once gathered to laugh at Socrates.  Aristophanes first presented his satirical play The Clouds at the City Dionysia festival of 423 BC, and it was most likely performed on this very stage.  (Here is a photo I took of the theatre and a close-up the crouching Silenus, also a later Roman Silenus mask, which obviously resembles Socrates.)

Silenus at Theatre of Dionysus

The stage was later restored by the Romans who added the reliefs that now stand at the back of the stage, depicting scenes from the myth of Dionysus, including a crouching Silenus, his drunken tutor.  Plato’s Symposium depicts Alcibiades comparing Socrates to Silenus.  There is indeed a striking similarity between most depictions of Socrates and of Silenus.  This association was well-known so generations of theatre-goers looking at this crouching bearded figure must have been reminded, to some extent, of Socrates, especially if the satires Aristophanes and others, mocking him, were performed here.   As we’ll see, though, Socrates was ultimately depicted as exhibiting complete philosophical indifference to being ridiculed in public, like a true forerunner of Stoicism.

Silenus MaskSocrates is one of the central characters of The Clouds where he’d depicted as a pompous buffoon, apparently a cross between a natural philosopher like Anaxagoras and a Sophist like Prodicus.  He’s depicted running a philosophical school called The Thinkery where he charges high fees to reveal his wisdom.  Pallid long-haired young men dressed in dirty rags like beggars, and bearing staffs, hang on his every word, as if they’re members of a cult.

In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is depicted defending himself during his trial for impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens.  He mentions that these charges aren’t the real reason he’s being brought to trial.  Among other things, he’s unjustly acquired a bad reputation among the Athenian public because slanderous rumours have spread about him fuelled by the plays of Aristophanes.

Well, what do the slanderers say? They shall be my prosecutors, and I will sum up their words in an affidavit: ‘Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others.’ Such is the nature of the accusation: it is just what you have yourselves seen in the comedy of Aristophanes who has introduced a man whom he calls Socrates, going about and saying that he walks in air, and talking a deal of nonsense concerning matters of which I do not pretend to know either much or little—not that I mean to speak disparagingly of any one who is a student of natural philosophy. I should be very sorry if Meletus could bring so grave a charge against me. But the simple truth is, O Athenians, that I have nothing to do with physical speculations. Very many of those here present are witnesses to the truth of this, and to them I appeal. […] As little foundation is there for the report that I am a teacher, and take money; this accusation has no more truth in it than the other.

Aristophanes also mentions Socrates in two of his later satires: The Birds and The Frogs.  Three satires competed for the prize at the annual City Dionysia festival.  Remarkably, in the year The Clouds was performed one of the other two plays was also about Socrates,  the Connus of Ameipsias.  Socrates was clearly a popular target for satire in 423 BC.

A: Socrates – shining in a small gathering, eclipsed in a large – have you come to join us as well? Tough, eh? Where did you get that coat? No shoes on your feet. You’re bankrupting the cobblers with your insults!
B: Still he’d rather starve than flatter!

It’s striking that Ameipsias portrays Socrates as strangely dressed, shoeless, and starving – in a manner that seems very consistent with Aristophanes’ depiction of him.  Likewise, another poet called Eupolis, of uncertain date, was clearly more acerbic in his criticisms: “Yes and I loathe that poverty-stricken windbag Socrates who contemplates everything in the world but does not know where his next meal is coming from.”  Socrates arguably sounds more like a forerunner of the Cynics in these plays: he’s consistently portrayed as someone who voluntarily dresses like a beggar, embraces poverty, and eats sparingly.

However, according to Diogenes Laertius, Socrates said “We ought not to object, he used to say, to be subjects for the Comic poets, for if they satirize our faults they will do us good, and if not they do not touch us.  There’s also a story that during one performance of The Clouds foreign visitors to the Athenian festival could be heard whispering “Who is this Socrates?”  Socrates silently rose from his seat making himself visible to the rest of the audience.  Although they didn’t know him, the foreigners would probably have been able to recognize his features from those caricatured on stage by the actor’s comic mask.  In other words, he wasn’t ashamed of being ridiculed as a pompous buffoon on stage but took it with good grace.

Roundup of Videos on Stoicism

I’ve been doing quite a few video interviews about Stoicism over the past year or so. Here’s a roundup of some of them.

Stoic TelevisionI’ve been doing quite a few video interviews and webinars about Stoicism over the past year or so. Here’s a roundup of some of them.

  1. Short webinar on Socrates, Stoicism and Cognitive Therapy.
  2. My Introduction to Stoicism talk from the Stoicon 2017 conference on Modern Stoicism in Toronto.
  3. My talk on Stoicism, Mindfulness and Cognitive Therapy from the Stoicon 2016 conference on Modern Stoicism in New York.
  4. Interview about Stoicism in the modern world with Philip Ghezelbash.
  5. My workshop on Stoicism and Love from the Stoicon 2015 conference in London.
  6. The original pilot webinar for the Stoic Mindfulness and Resilience Training (SMRT) online course.
  7. Interview on Stoicism and Online Communities with Justin Vacula.
  8. Round table discussion about applying Stoicism at work, in prisons, in the military, and online from Stoicon 2014 in London.
  9. Video review of Little Stoics Children’s Books with my daughter, Poppy.
  10. Review of my book The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (2010) by Brian Johnson.
  11. Interview for Meet the Modern Stoics with Scott Perry.
  12. Interview on Stoicism, Anxiety, and OCD for The OCD Stories.
  13. The Stoic Handbook of Epictetus, video slideshow.
  14. Review of The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (2010) by Frode Osen.
  15. Introduction to Stoic Exercises Webinar
  16. Unboxing Ryan Holiday’s Memento Mori coin
  17. Marcus Aurelius in the Roman Histories
  18. Marcus Aurelius: Stoicism and Anger
  19. The Stoicism of Marcus Aurelius: Practical Tips
  20. What is Modern Stoicism?
  21. Video book review of Diogenes by M.D. Usher with my daughter, Poppy.


SMRT Week Three: Stoic Mindfulness

Welcome to Week Three of SMRT 2016: Stoic Mindfulness

Week 2: Stoic Mindfulness

The big question for this week is:

What are the benefits of recalling what’s under your control and what isn’t in difficult situations? What would be the long-term consequences of blurring this distinction?

Please take a moment to post your thoughts about this question in the Comment section of the final page in Week Three, after doing reading for this week.

Some donations have already been received from participants via the PayPal button that’s been added to the site. We’re extremely grateful for even the smallest donations because they help to fund continual development of the site and covers ongoing expenses like our hosting costs. You can also contribute an amount of your own choosing right now by using this PayPal link.  Thanks for your support!

As always, if you need any help, please feel free to contact me.


Donald Robertson
Course Facilitator

SMRT Week Two: Stoic Virtues

Welcome to Week Two of SMRT 2016: Stoic Virtues

Week 2: Stoic Virtues

The big question for this week is:

What do you think would be the pros and cons of living a life in which you take excellence of character (Stoic “virtue”) to be the only thing that’s intrinsically good?

Please take a moment to post your thoughts about this question in the Comment section of the final page in Week Two, after doing reading for this week.

As always, if you need any help, please feel free to contact me.


Donald Robertson
Course Facilitator